After all, we're living in the 21st century, not in the highly stratified social world of Downton Abbey.However, the uncomfortable truth is we do gravitate to partners who have the most in common with us, which means we tend to date within our social classes and education levels."These lopsided numbers might not matter if young, college-educated women become more willing to date — and, eventually, marry — across socioeconomic lines," Birger explained in the Washington Post.At face value, the suggestion that women date outside their class seems hopelessly old-fashioned, not to mention politically incorrect.They map out long-term plans, meet with mentors, and take specific steps to try to control their career trajectories.People from working-class backgrounds were no less open to advancement, but often were less actively involved in trying to create opportunities for themselves, preferring instead to take advantage of openings when they appeared.Apart from weakened labor protections and the uneven distribution of productivity gains to workers, marital trends can play a role in maintaining inequality as well.
A new study suggests that one overlooked root of relationship problems is social class.note, you can’t opt out—calling it a classless society doesn’t make it one, and what class you come from will influence the choices available to you in a way that affects the rest of your life.All the participants answered a set of 12 questions discussing class and their relationships, with items like: “How did social class influence the kind of organized/social activities you participated in when you were a child?They wanted to see how attitudes about education, work, money, and social capital affected how couples fought.The couples were predominantly white—one person self-identified as Iranian-American, two as Bosnian—and heterosexual, with one gay male couple and one lesbian couple.The book raises some interesting questions about what we look for in a mate, as well as some alternative solutions for the marriage-minded among us.(Apparently, if you're a lady who wants to put a ring on it, Silicon Valley is a single-man mecca.) But Birger also suggests that this "man shortage" might result in a surprising trend: women dating outside their class and education levels.In her 2015 book , the sociologist Jessi Streib shows that marriages between someone with a middle-class background and someone with a working-class background can involve differing views on all sorts of important things—child-rearing, money management, career advancement, how to spend leisure time.In fact, couples often overlook class-based differences in beliefs, attitudes, and practices until they begin to cause conflict and tension.After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.I wouldn't really date somebody from a lower social class, i don't usually like/respect these people much.My rule of thumb: I do not judge, And the person always gets a chance.I grew up upper middle/lower upper class, but I honestly don't care about a woman's socioeconomic level, occupation, or educational background when deciding whether or not to spend time with her or even date her.But can a lower class person date an upper class individual, and make it a successful relationship? If i met a woman who was kind, And real I would not care about her "Class" in regards to career, background etc.